Guest Post: Depression Within A Depression

Tyler Durden's picture Submitted by Tyler Durden on 10/23/2010 10:22 -0500

Alan GreenspanBarack ObamaBen BernankeChryslerFannie MaeFederal ReserveFreddie MacGamblingGeneral MotorsGovernment StimulusGreat DepressionGross Domestic ProductGuest PostHousing BubbleKrugmanLudwig von MisesMarket CrashMonetary PolicyMoney SupplyNational DebtPaul KrugmanPersonal ConsumptionPrecious MetalsPresident ObamaPrivate Domestic InvestmentRecessionrecoveryStimulus SpendingUnemploymentWhite House

Submitted by Jim Quinn of the Burning Platform

Depression Within a Depression

In recent months, worshippers at the altar of Keynes have been hyperventilating over the possibility Congress will run a deficit of “only” $1.5 trillion in 2010. They have issued dire proclamations about a replay of the 1937-1938 Depression within the Great Depression. White House favorite and #1 Keynesian on the planet, Paul Krugman, declared that not borrowing an additional $100 billion to hand out to the unemployed for another 99 weeks would surely plunge the country into recession again.

“Suddenly, creating jobs is out, inflicting pain is in. Condemning deficits and refusing to help a still-struggling economy has become the new fashion everywhere, including the United States, where 52 senators voted against extending aid to the unemployed despite the highest rate of long-term joblessness since the 1930s. Many economists, myself included, regard this turn to austerity as a huge mistake. It raises memories of 1937, when F.D.R.’s premature attempt to balance the budget helped plunge a recovering economy back into severe recession.” – Paul Krugman in NYT     So did Roosevelt’s attempt to balance the budget in 1937 cause the second major downturn in 1938? I’m a trusting soul, but I prefer to verify what is being peddled to me by any economist, especially Paul Krugman. 

Ghost of Keynes Past

Today’s Keynesian economists have convinced boobus Americanus that the Great Depression was caused by the Federal Reserve being too tight with monetary policy and the Hoover administration not providing enough fiscal stimulus. Ben Bernanke and Barack Obama used this line of reasoning to ram through an $850 billion pork-laden stimulus package, as well as the purchase of $1.2 trillion of toxic mortgages by the Federal Reserve.

The only trouble is that this storyline is a complete sham.

The fact that colossal stimulus spending, zero interest rates, the purchase of over a trillion in toxic assets by the Fed, and the loosest monetary policy in history have done absolutely nothing to revitalize the economy, has proven that Keynesian policies have been a wretched failure. This is not a surprise to Austrian school economists.

Keynesian policies failed during the Great Depression, and they are failing today. An economic catastrophe caused by loose monetary policies, crushing levels of debt, and appalling lending practices cannot be solved by looser monetary policies, issuance of twice as much debt, and government commanding banks (or, in the case of Fannie and Freddie, “commandeering”)  to make more bad loans.

Ludwig von Mises described what happened in the 1920s and 1930s. His explanation accurately illustrates the situation in America today.

“There is no means of avoiding the final collapse of a boom brought on by credit and fiat monetary expansion. The only question is whether the crisis should come sooner in the form of a recession or later as a final and total catastrophe of depression as the currency systems crumble.”

The Roaring Twenties

They don’t call the 1920s roaring because money wasn’t flowing freely and consumers were practicing frugality. The newly created Federal Reserve expanded credit by setting below-market interest rates and low reserve requirements that favored the big Wall Street banks. The Federal Reserve increased the money supply by 60% during the period following the recession of 1921. By the latter part of the decade, “buying on margin” entered the American vocabulary as more and more Americans overextended themselves to speculate on the soaring stock market.

The 1920s marked the beginning of mass production and the emergence of consumerism in America, with automobiles a prominent symbol of the latter. In 1919, there were just 6.7 million cars on American roads. By 1929, the number had grown to more than 27 million cars, or nearly one car for every household. During this period banks offered the country’s first home mortgages and manufacturers of everything – from cars to irons – allowed consumers to pay “on time.” Installment credit soared during the 1920s. About 60% of all furniture and 75% of all radios were purchased on installment plans. Thrift and saving were replaced in the new consumer society by spending and borrowing.

Encouraging the spending, the three Republican administrations of the 1920s practiced laissez-faire economics, starting by cutting top tax rates from 77% to 25% by 1925. Non-intervention into business and banking became government policy. These policies led to overconfidence on the part of investors and a classic credit-induced speculative boom. Gambling in the markets by the wealthy increased. While the rich got richer, millions of Americans lived below the household poverty line of $2,000 per year. The days of wine and roses came to an abrupt end in October 1929, with the Great Stock Market Crash.

Between 1929 and 1932, the market fell 89% from its high. The Keynesian storyline is that Herbert Hoover’s administration did nothing to try and revive the economy. It took Franklin Delano Roosevelt and his New Deal Keynesian policies to save the country. It’s a nice story, but completely false. Between 1929 and 1933, when Roosevelt came to power, the Hoover administration increased real per-capita federal expenditures by 88%, not exactly austere.

Excessive Consumer Spending

When examining the BEA chart of GDP from 1929 to 1939, some fascinating similarities with today’s economy leap out. In 1929, consumer expenditures accounted for 72.3% of GDP, confirming that the much-commented-upon American consumerism is not a modern development. In fact, consumer spending peaked at 81% of GDP in 1932 and remained above 70% during the entire depression.

By 1950 consumer expenditures had subsided to 64% of GDP. In 1960, they had fallen to 63% and edged up to 64% by 1970, where they remained until 1980. By 1990 they had ticked up to 66% and by 2000 had reached 68%. The modern-day climax appeared to many to have been reached in 2007 at 70% of GDP. But in a replay of the New Deal playbook, where much of the consumerism was funded by make-work projects and federal transfer payments, the federal government has thrown billions of dollars at consumers to buy houses, cars, and appliances. Consumer expenditures as a percentage of GDP actually rose to 71% in 2009. It should be readily apparent that until consumer expenditures are narrowed to a level that leads to a sustainable balanced economy, the current depression will continue indefinitely.

Bureau of Economic Analysis National Income and Product Accounts Table

Table 1.1.6A. Real Gross Domestic Product, Chained (1937) Dollars [Billions of chained (1937) dollars]  1929  1930  1931  1932  1933  1934  1935  1936  1937  1938  1939 Gross domestic product87.379.874.664.964.071.077.387.491.988.795.9Personal consumption expenditures63.159.757.852.651.555.158.564.566.865.869.4Gross private domestic investment12.28.15.11.52.34.17.69.712.28.010.3Net exports of goods and services0.80.40.20.0-0.10.2-0.5-0.30.10.91.0Government consumption expenditures and gross investment9.210.210.610.29.911.111.513.412.813.815.0The Depression Within the Depression

The Great Depression lasted from 1929 until 1940. What is not well known is that GDP was at the same level in 1936 as it had been in 1929. In no small part because GDP soared by 37% between 1933 and 1936. The unemployment rate in 1929 was 5%. In 1936, even after GDP had recovered to pre-depression levels, the unemployment rate was still 15%. It spiked back to 18% in 1938 and stayed above 15% until World War II. Tellingly, in 1936, private domestic investment was 21% below the level of 1929.

By contrast, government expenditures surged by 46% between 1929 and 1936. With the government creating agencies and hiring people into make-work projects, private industry was crowded out. The extensive governmental economic planning and intervention that began during the Hoover administration was expanded significantly under Roosevelt. The bolstering of wage rates and prices, expansion of credit, propping up of weak firms, and increased government spending on public works prolonged the Great Depression.

The evidence strongly contradicts the notion promoted by Krugman and other Keynesian worshippers that the supposed 1937-38 Depression within the Great Depression was caused by Roosevelt becoming a believer in austerity. In fact, GDP only dropped by 3.5% in 1938 and rebounded by 8.1% in 1939. What actually collapsed in 1938 was private investment, which fell 34%. By contrast, government spending declined by only 4.5% in 1938, confirming that Roosevelt did not slash spending. To the extent that he eased up on the accelerator, it was by cutting back on jobs programs like those provided by the Works Progress Administration and the Public Works Administration.

The reason private investment collapsed in 1938 was Roosevelt’s anti-business crusade. He denounced big business as the cause of the depression. In March 1938, FDR appointed Yale University law professor Thurman Arnold to head the antitrust division of the Justice Department. Arnold soon hired some 300 lawyers to file antitrust lawsuits against businesses. Arnold launched cases against entire industries, with lawsuits against the milk, oil, tobacco, shoe machinery, tires, fertilizer, railroad, pharmaceuticals, school supplies, billboards, fire insurance, liquor, typewriter, and movie industries.

The Greater Depression and Excessive Debt

Some Conclusions

The mainstream media’s popular narrative about the causes and cure for the Great Depression invariably start with the storyline that the stock market crash caused the Great Depression. Herbert Hoover purportedly refused to spend government money in an effort to reinvigorate the economy. Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s New Deal government spending programs allegedly saved America.

This storyline is a big lie.

The Great Depression was caused by Federal Reserve expansion of the money supply in the 1920s that led to an unsustainable credit-driven boom. When the Federal Reserve belatedly tightened in 1928, it was too late to avoid financial collapse. According to Murray Rothbard, in his book America’s Great Depression, the artificial interference in the economy was a disaster prior to the depression, and government efforts to prop up the economy after the crash of 1929 only made things worse. Government intervention delayed the market’s adjustment and made the road to complete recovery more difficult.

The parallels with today are uncanny. Alan Greenspan expanded the money supply after the dot-com bust, dropped interest rates to 1%, encouraged a credit-driven boom, and created a gigantic housing bubble. By the time the Fed realized they had created a bubble, it was too late. The government response to the 2008 financial collapse has been to expand the money supply, reduce interest rates to 0%, borrow and spend $850 billion on useless make-work pork projects, encourage spending by consumers on cars and appliances, and artificially prop up housing through tax credits and anti-foreclosure programs. The National Debt has been driven higher by $2.7 trillion in the last 18 months.

The government has sustained insolvent Wall Street banks with $700 billion of taxpayer funds and continues to waste taxpayer money on dreadfully run companies like Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, General Motors, and Chrysler. The government is prolonging the agony by not allowing the real economy to bottom and begin a sound recovery based on savings, investment, and sustainable fiscal policies. President Obama continues to scorn business by creating more burdensome healthcare, financial, and energy regulations.

Today’s politicians and monetary authorities have learned the wrong lessons from the Great Depression. The result will be a second, Greater Depression and more pain for the middle class. The investment implications of government stimulus programs are further debasement of the currency and ultimately inflation and surging interest rates. Owning precious metals and mining stocks, and shorting U.S. Treasuries will pay off over the next few years. 

Regular Casey Report contributor James Quinn is the head of strategic planning for one of the world’s most prestigious business schools and the host of TheBurningPlatform.com blog.

4.39394 Your rating: None Average: 4.4 (33 votes)
» Share/Save Login or register to post commentsPrinter-friendly versionSend to friend

by trip nixon
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 10:31
#671820

I don’t know how to submit tips to Tyler, but I made a startling discovery this weekend. I cropped and pasted the rallies from March to mid-April (the second leg up on the rally) to the most recent rally from Sept to mid-Oct. What I discovered were two charts that were almost visually identical, and also the same height.

My question for Tyler and his experts is: What are the odds of this happening in nature?

http://dejavutrading.blogspot.com/2010/10/you-might-find-this-interestin…

My website looks at historical comparisons to look for trading edges: http://dejavutrading.blogspot.com/

Login or register to post comments by Implicit simplicit
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 10:43
#671832

Interesting.

Keeping my cash insurance for a couple of years. I think the old saying of “buy the rumor , sell the news” will apply to QE2. Frontrun QE2-sell the news.

Login or register to post comments by treemagnet
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 11:44
#671917

I agree, except I already voted bearish until I found ZH and discovered I was competing with Ben’s POMO bullshit.  But, it ain’t over – I’m just early.

Login or register to post comments by Winston Smith 2009
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 11:02
#671859

Could this have something to do with the fact that 70% of the trades are now from HFT? In other words, computer algorithms gradually producing the same approximate curve in both cases?

Login or register to post comments by SteveNYC
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 12:10
#671964

I believe you’ve nailed it. Anything “organic” would have, and has, sold this market a long time ago. It is merely a scalping mechanism now for HFT and established Wall St. chop-shops…..until it is not. 

How many times will the Earth appear to “normally” rotate the sun until something disrupts its (and therefore the entire solar systems) orbit (removal of a condition)? How many times can HFT run the market up in what appears to be a “normal” fashion, before one condition is removed and the whole thing comes down? What will this “condition” be?

Even the hedge funds are starting to drop out of the charade as they simply can not justify their existence anymore, in many cases.

Just sit on the sidelines and watch, in my opinion I believe that, in our lifetimes, we are guaranteed to see a phenomenal event concerning “markets”.

Login or register to post comments by Rasna
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 12:32
#671996

I agree…

The initial “model” produced a result with a positive outcome… Having proved the hypothesis and confirmed the “facts” (Can the market be manipulated to produce a desired outcome – higher and higher prices that are decoupled from economic reality and fundamentals?)

  Yes, by massive injections of liquidity… Can this process be repeated?  Let’s try by resetting the model and the initial conditions.  Ergo, the latest ramp that looks identical to the first.

If you think about chaos theory, and the uncertainty associated with large inherently unstable systems, with many degrees of freedom, relying on the model to repeat the results indefinitely (or even a 3rd time) is like playing Russian roulette… Eventially a round will be chambered, and the player (Fed) will blow their brains out.

Login or register to post comments by jeff montanye
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 23:15
#672850

and i agree.  three times won’t be the charm.  two will be pushing it but i’m shooting for lower treasury yields, gold and stocks by the new year.  more muted than ’08 but worth trading.  we shall see.  what diversifies (complements) a gold and silver portfolio best over the next five years?  besides lead (brass, ammo, guns) and spam (etc.).  thanks.

Login or register to post comments by sgt_doom
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 12:39
#672017

+1,000

Login or register to post comments by greyghost
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 19:05
#672515

HI……my name is IGNORATI BOOBUS AMERICANUS….i have drunk from the poisoned well…..i need help…that is why i am here

Login or register to post comments by greased up deaf guy
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 12:43
#672030

similar observation made on the 20th (originally found by bill lumbergh)…

http://blog.afraidtotrade.com/unusual-similarities-in-structure-for-curr…

Login or register to post comments by ZackLo
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 16:42
#672346

Murray N. Rothbard was brilliant, I wish I could have met the man before he died.

If you guys are interested heres some of his lectures on the 20th century….

http://mises.org/media.aspx?action=category&ID=213

his voice is a little repetitive because of the audio at first but you get used to the quality after listening to a couple, Definitly a scholar with analyzation of history thats impeccable.

Login or register to post comments by Sean7k
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 10:34
#671823

Very well constructed argument. Could have delved into the creation of cartels, protection of unions and other government snafu’s during the depression, but overall- right on the money. Thanks!

Login or register to post comments by B9K9
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 11:40
#671912

Hey Sean, I liked the comment you made on a previous thread where you noted that governments exist primarily for the benefit of the governors. Once one has this proper orientation, it becomes much easier to analyze and synthesize the various programs initiated under the rubic of ‘common good’.

Keynes is an excellent example. Rather than have any meaningful effect, its purpose is solely devoted to protecting & advancing the control mechanisms already in place to further enrich the controllers. Any residual effect serves only to calm the herd to forestall potential rebellion.

It’s a mistake to get caught debating angels on a pinhead. That is, actually question the merits of Keynes – it’s merely a diversion. To paraphrase Voltaire, if Keynes didn’t exist, the power-elite would have had to invent him. IOW, some/any mechanism had to be advanced (and blessed with academic respect) that promoted the policies we see today to ensure the PTB maintain their control.

Our only possible way out is if they have finally miscalculated. It’s a rare event, but it happens periodically throughout history. Here’s hoping for our generation.

Login or register to post comments by Sean7k
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 12:18
#671973

Thanks. It is the result of studying Rothbard and anarcho-capitalism, but it makes sense to me. 

I agree about Keynes, in fact, I would argue the elites did use Smith, Ricardo and Mills to great effect. Always using the useful part of their theory and discarding or downplaying the part that was in conflict. 

I think our only way out is to realize that these are incredibly intelligent and resourceful people. To know thy enemy as you know thyself. To realize their move will not be predictable or expected, but will work very well and be prepared. 

I have been studying up on operation blue beam as of late and that is one interesting segue to global control. A little tinfoilish, but then, I’m a tinfoil kind of guy.

By the way, I always enjoy your posts, very informative.

Login or register to post comments by sgt_doom
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 12:46
#672036

You, sir, sound like a true scholar…..

Login or register to post comments by Red Neck Repugnicant
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 14:12
#672151

I disagree.

Not only is it factually incorrect, it’s poorly written.

 

Login or register to post comments by Sean7k
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 14:38
#672198

Well. perhaps you can clarify as to how and why? or are you such an esteemed scholar it is not necessary.

Login or register to post comments by traderjoe
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 18:09
#672435

RNR is the Andy Kaufman of ZH. He is a performance artist. Popping in simply to rile people up and watch the fireworks. Pay him no heed. 

Login or register to post comments by jeff montanye
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 23:33
#672862

but it is mill (john stuart) not mills.  keynes is also very imperfectly explicated on this website (my favorite).  he is confused with his bastardization, obfuscation, manipulation and actual inversion by the “power elite”, the “politicians”, the “government”.  he said the government should save in an expansion so as to dissave in a contraction.  that’s not what they did.  they dissaved in an expansion and now seek to save in a contraction.  it’s not keynes’ fault.  he, in a way like jesus and others, found a truth that was true but very hard to follow.

p.s. good kings have done this, in a less rigorously described way, since the invention of agriculture.

Login or register to post comments by Sean7k
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 23:40
#672882

Still, he believed in government intervention. This is problematic. I will agree the monetarists are at the root of the problem, but as fabian socialist, Keynes believed in the idea of a superior intelligence guiding common people for their benefit. A superior intelligence residing in a select elite. He believed in government above free markets and here he is a failure.

Login or register to post comments by pan-the-ist
on Sun, 10/24/2010 – 00:12
#672917

You sir, are but dirt on the toe of a worm that Keynes stepped on.

Login or register to post comments by tmosley
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 17:07
#672375

You’re a moron.

There weren’t any facts presented in that post, only opinions based on the works of others (which is fine).  To wave off the post as factually incorrect only demonstrates that you failed to read/understand what he was saying.

Why don’t you go back to the Obama forums, and leave the adults in peace?  If you just like to be a troll, go to 4chan.  I’m sure you’ll get more of a reaction there.

Login or register to post comments by New_Meat
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 20:26
#672619

Love it: facts wrong and grammar police at the same time!

I’d bet your neck isn’t really red.

– Ned

Login or register to post comments by StychoKiller
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 23:25
#672859

So, does “Tan in a Can” come in other colors besides orange, then? :>D

Login or register to post comments by MisesFTW
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 22:38
#672799

Nice post, sans anarcho-capitalism. IMO, It’s garbage. I’ve been to the Mises Institute and was not impressed by Murphy’s defense, or Walter Bloch’s for that matter. I also found that indirectly, and sometimes directly, connecting Austrian economics to libertarianism / movement, if you will, very unsettling.

Austrian economics looks great on paper; as did Keynesian economics. Keynesian economics was implemented, i’m sure we all know why. Austrian economics will NEVER be implemented. Human reaction toward greed, fear, competition, etc is not conducive to Austrian economic policies. I postulate this using human history as my source.

Login or register to post comments by Cathartes Aura
on Sun, 10/24/2010 – 00:37
#672948

nice to see someone post a recognition that “these are incredibly intelligent and resourceful people” – rather than the usual “oh man, they are sooo stoopid!!!” – I liked your post Sean 7k. . . it’s good to research circles around their actions, rather than just follow up from behind them.

with regards operation blue beam – don’t know if you caught the press on sept. 27th (I don’t “do” news much, though I often follow links from some of the smarter ones here at ZH), but this is a good link to the variants:

http://www.wanttoknow.info/ufos/ufos_national_press_club_witness_testimony

quite the wild ride should these possibles be “unveiled”, eh? hehe.

Login or register to post comments by DavidPierre
on Sun, 10/24/2010 – 02:46
#673013

Astronauts, generals, top officials reveal major UFO cover-up in this UFO video (90 min)

http://personalgrowthcourses.net/video/ufo_videos

http://personalgrowthcourses.net/video/ufo_videos_2

…………………………………………………………………………..

{Yeah… I know… they all are nuts and you know better… this is just “tin-foil-hat” stuff.  Watch it first then you make up your already closed mind.}

Login or register to post comments by Pants McPants
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 12:20
#671980

Excellent comment, especially paraphrasing Voltaire.  It has been a six year journey for me, from lefty (grew up in MN) to righty (military) to Ron Paul to anarcho-capitalism.  With the exception of now, every previous philosophy didn’t sit right.  There were contraditions.  There were shysters.

I think it was Frank Shostak of the Mises Institute who said it, but he said something to the effect of government need for Keynesian policies preceeded Keynesian economics.

Despite the gloomy nature of my response, I believe in (most) of our generation.  Unfortunately it’s going to take a long time to wake up most people…..and I need to work on my patience – especially with my ignorant friends!

Login or register to post comments by nuinut
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 19:47
#672577

IMO, Edward Bernays’ contribution was probably on a par with Keynes, he has just remained under a lot more radars. But that’s really just another angel to fit on that pinhead. 

Login or register to post comments by ebworthen
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 10:45
#671826

Besides being economic fellatio that will produce no children, the bailouts and sanctioning of privatized gains and socialized losses of the hedonic oligarchy reinforced the laxity of the indolent and lust for mammon of the corrupt to the shame and detriment of the responsible wishing to live free.

Login or register to post comments by tsx500
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 12:26
#671991

 . . . . you had me at fellatio ……..

Login or register to post comments by Paul E. Math
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 15:57
#672289

I’m thinking the bailouts were more like another sexual act that would also be unlikely to produce any children.  Except, perhaps, those kids that you ‘drop off at the pool’.

Login or register to post comments by traderjoe
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 18:13
#672439

Wow, a fantastic turn of the phrase…

Login or register to post comments by sushi
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 10:37
#671827

Great article!! Too bad they couldn’t blame the Chinese for the 1929 crash and subsequent depression.

Also, why is no one reporting on the contribution of American industry? Walmart is responsible for 10% of US imports from China, each of the Fortune 500 has major operations in China and all of them benefited by exporting jobs and capital and re-importing finished product.

Login or register to post comments by 11b40
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 12:31
#672001

Yes, Sushi, and you are touching on another major point. 

In the 30’s & 40’s, we still made things in this country but unemployment still remained in the 15% range until WW2.  How do we expect to add jobs in today’s environment?  Low demand = Low investment = Few new jobs = Lower demand = Lower investment = Even fewer jobs = …….

Login or register to post comments by sushi
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 14:37
#672194

I think the issue in the ’30s and ’40s is that there was a major agricultural failure and the population was driven off the land. This collapsed demand and there was no way to reabsorb those who had left the farm. Did not matter what the Fed did, it was not able to reignite the economy.

The irony today is that a lot of the Fed’s liquidity is being moved overseas and invested in  EM, increasing thier productive capactiy and employment levels. My hunch is that we see the ROW pick up and undergo expansion, ROW demand will boost commodities demand (oil) and this will feed through into the advanced economies which will still not see job growth but will see higher input costs, decreasing margins and cost of living increases as consumers absorb the higher prices resulting from a yuan revaluation.

I doubt war would offer a solution. You no longer need that many boots on the ground, or expensive airfleets. Just a couple of tomahawks and ROVs being flown out of Nevada.

Login or register to post comments by BurningFuld
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 17:00
#672367

@sushi

“Walmart is responsible for 10% of US imports from China, each of the Fortune 500 has major operations in China and all of them benefited by exporting jobs and capital and re-importing finished product” that Americans had to borrow money to purchase.

Now the loop is complete.

Login or register to post comments by tmosley
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 17:15
#672386

There have been plenty of agricultural failures prior to that, and it never caused a 15 year depression before.

That is not what caused the depression.  It was 100% caused by government meddling in the economy.  Look at the differences in the initial economic shock and length of the GD and the Depression of 1920, then compare the reactions of the government.

Login or register to post comments by New_Meat
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 20:30
#672626

+1 and yep. – Ned

Login or register to post comments by Fred Hayek
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 21:01
#672664

Amen.  Besides Rothbard’s book about the depression, Liaquat Ahamed’s book, The Lords of Finance, does a great job explaining how the central banks, especially the Fed, caused the great depression and worsened things when there was still time to head off the depths of it.

Login or register to post comments by New_Meat
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 20:42
#672639

sushi-time to hit the books.

Issue in the ’30s ain’t close to the ’40s.

In the ’30s, well Fed (and other central banks) slurping in cash to prevent inflation.  Smoot-Hawley protection (coming to a neighborhood near you real soon now).

If by ROW you mean “remainder of the world” then you well understand the Roosevelt policies that Our Dear President is attempting to recreate.  Union employment at the end of the ’30s was higher than at the beginning, but, well, what we call U-6 today was [ed.] in the mid-20% as we see today.

Now, the 40s-war, then the great unblocking in ’46, yes a recession but they were rather tough, then away the U.S. economy went, including huge investment into Europe and Japan to rebuild their economies.

and, well, a couple of TLAMs don’t win wars.  Takes a crowd of 0311s and 11Bs with support to put the gleep onto the bad guys.

– Ned

 

Login or register to post comments by pan-the-ist
on Sun, 10/24/2010 – 00:18
#672928

The bad guys…

Just wondering who you consider to be the bad guys these days…

Login or register to post comments by ToNYC
on Sun, 10/24/2010 – 06:26
#673092

 

What about TAX CREDIT favoring EXCLUSIVELY Domestic-sourced businesses…including energy and natural gas. Energy sans Wahabbis.

Login or register to post comments by sgt_doom
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 12:56
#672052

I agree with your remarks excepting for “Great article!!”

I think it has many, many shortcomings.

The author states:

“The Great Depression was caused by Federal Reserve expansion of the money supply in the 1920s that led to an unsustainable credit-driven boom.”

 

Like that pseudo-genius stooge, Bernanke, he leaves out a number of variables, such as the economic scam foisted upon them back then know as Prohibition (1920-1933), having similar effects as the tax cuts for the super-rich has today.  Likewise, those monies laundered through the exchange is almost equivalent, size-wise, to the leveraged speculation by the hedge funds, banksters, and the rape and pillaging by private equity leveraged buyout firms today.

 

Also, one MUST take into account those complex structured OTC assets and securitization, beginning back in 1909 and which really took off in the ’20s, leading up to the Great Crash.

 

Roosevelt was exactly right in his blame, and Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan are up to the same old tricks today.

 

Same script, over and over again.

 

The reason the stimulus doesn’t work is due to the dismantling of the US economy over the past 35 years, using those tools of jobs offshoring (labor arbitrage), hedge funds, PE leveraged buyout firms, with the underlying command and control paved by securitizations and credit derivatives.

 

It is really quite simply when one examines the big picture.

 

Study suggestions:  Markit Group, InterContinental Exchange [ICE, ICE Futures, ICE Clear, etc.], Climate Exchange PLC, ELX Futures, Sungard ownership, DTCC, ICE US Trust, Regulatory DataCorp’s Global Regulatory Information Database [Compliance G.R.I.D.], and so on.

Login or register to post comments by razorthin
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 16:21
#672322

The point is that the Fed is the enabler of first resort.  So ultimately, the government, a la 1913, has only itself to blame.

Login or register to post comments by piceridu
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 10:38
#671828

Thanks Jim, a nice retrospective look at the folly that took place back then.

Login or register to post comments by Aghast in Midlothian
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 10:45
#671835

Interesting read- makes me wonder what guys as bright as Krugman and el Presidente (and I do believe they are bright) are thinking. Assuming stupidity is off the table, there are only three possibilities – incompetence, economic/political ideological inflexibility or malice (crash the system)…or some combination.

Place your bets and buckle up.

 

Login or register to post comments by baserunr
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 11:27
#671889

The outtake from Krugman says it all.  They desperately want to avoid the pain.  Pain of making their friends realize financial losses.  Pain of dislocation. Pain of uncertainty.  But mostly, the pain of recognition that they have been wrong, all this time.  Everything they have collectively staked their careers on is a sham, and the pain of that realization is too much to bear.  Better that future generations suffer under crushing debt than we have to admit “We were wrong”.

Login or register to post comments by SteveNYC
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 12:49
#672040

Solid observation. The “ego” has had such a dastardly impact on the human race as a whole throughout history, why would it be any different this time?

Krugman is not necessarily an “idiot”, he is just very, very unconscious. He is a robot, he is programmed, and fear lof failure will continue to keep him in his comatose state.

Login or register to post comments by macholatte
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 12:49
#672042

 

They desperately want to avoid the pain.

 

There is no pain if a numbing effect happens first. One anesthetic we can see used is mass media bullshit (propaganda) thrown everywhere until there is no place to turn for truth, justice and the American way. So people become sheeple and just put their heads down and go back to work and try to eek out a living.  They vote a straight Dem or Rep ticket and refuse to accept the idea of one party rule. It’s too complicated. They choose to live in denial because it’s safer, simpler and logical.

 

 

 

Login or register to post comments by StychoKiller
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 23:32
#672868

You can drown in de-Nile, assuming the crocodiles don’t eat you first!

Login or register to post comments by ToNYC
on Sun, 10/24/2010 – 06:31
#673093

 

BWM…Brilliant While Misguided

Login or register to post comments by Psquared
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 10:50
#671837

Nice historical summary and I mostly agree with the conclusions. One interesting sidelight to the study of the GD I is to look at recessions/depressions before the creation of the Federal Reserve. The argument made in 1909-1913 was that a central bank, which could change monetary policy and the money supply, could help smooth out the bumps caused by previous boom and bust cycles. It looks to me as though the Federal Reserve policies have actually made these cycles more severe because they are constantly overshooting or undershooting the mark – or just using plain old bad policy.

It also appears to me that the only way the current system “looks” like it is working is by promoting a constant rate of inflation and currency debasement which masquerades as growth. Unfortunately, there are too many people with a vested interest in the current system to change it. It will have to collapse and a lot of people are going to get hurt. I hope that more and more people will step forward and say, “look, we have experimented with a central bank and monetarism twice in our history and both times it failed; it is time to do it another way.”

Login or register to post comments by ebworthen
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 11:03
#671853

The idea of a Federal Reserve to “smooth out the bumps” is similar to health or other insurance companies.  The idea is good but it is corrupted by greed, bureacracy, and lawyers. 

You create fear and outrageous costs for treatment or repairs, then collect premiums which become a kind of tax, then there is a great big pool of money that becomes a target for attorneys and speculative investment. 

AIG is a perfect example here, an insurer that operated like a hedge fund, leveraging the payments for insurance from the responsible to speculate (gamble) with.  When they failed, the great dark pool of money of the FED (printing press, debt, future tax obligations of the individual) came to the rescue. 

Insurance for insurance, unbound by the constraints of government, operating for the benefit of the elites in banks, corporations, and government – all at the expense of the individual citizen (and especially the middle class).

Not only a bad idea but unethical, immoral, and illegal.

Login or register to post comments by zaknick
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 12:16
#671974

I’d use criminal, fascist and genocidal.

 

I sure hope I see lots of actual physical human heads rolling through the streets in a great big orgy of freedom (the blood of patriots and tyrants and all that).

 

Guillotines, bitchez!

Login or register to post comments by Imminent Crucible
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 20:37
#672635

That particular sort of orgy of freedom has a way of getting out of hand, and turning into an orgy of revenge.  Kinda like in France.  Liberté, égalité, fratricide.  I’ll settle for prison for the lot of them.  A Turkish prison.

Login or register to post comments by ThreeTrees
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 16:04
#672300

Hayekian Triangles.  Get some.

Login or register to post comments by ebworthen
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 21:29
#672704

I will look into it…

Login or register to post comments by lamont cranston
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 10:48
#671838

Why manufacture in the US? Between the EPA, OSHA, state and local kleptocracies, et al, not to mention tax codes, you’re screwed before you start.

Login or register to post comments by StychoKiller
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 23:34
#672875

But, but, … we gotta “save” the Environment!  Will someone PLEASE THINK of the children??

Login or register to post comments by RobotTrader
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 10:51
#671842

No doubt, the economy is flat on its back.

Some say we are in a full fledged depression.

However, the stimulus, zero interest, and POMOs have created another stock market bubble of epic proportions, at least in certain sectors.

Vast fortunes have been made, 4, 5 and 6 baggers everywhere off the March 2009 lows.

NFLX up 800%

PCLN up 700%

GMCR up 600%

CMG up 500%

AAPL up 400%

CAT up 400%

VMW up 375%

GDX up 350%

Login or register to post comments by rocker
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 11:02
#671858

Hello Robo,  “trip nixon” has a interesting bit of charts to view. I have seen this by others and have noticed that this leg is almost as long as the first run. Do you not agree that we are soon done.  Say around Dow 1250.

I also like to watch how many junks you get. I think of it as a interesting indicator. Credit for being right, so far.

Login or register to post comments by tmosley
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 17:20
#672392

If you understand that, why do you keep posting charts from individual stocks and claiming that the recovery is underway?  Why do you continue to hate on gold and all things gold related?

What is your malfunction?  You correctly identify the bubble and its cause, so why can’t you see the inevitable outcome?

Login or register to post comments by TwelfthVulture
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 19:46
#672576

I don’t know if Robotrader actually believes that a recovery is underway.  They are simply stating the fact that markets have been, for whatever reason, whether rightly or wrongly, consistently ginned higher.  More’s the better if Robo has managed to wring a few bucks from global banking cartel in the process.

Login or register to post comments by ToNYC
on Sun, 10/24/2010 – 06:35
#673094

 

A Recovery is indeed Underway. As in Charles MacKay’s book on “Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds”…they are slowly coming to their senses, and one by one.

Login or register to post comments by Oh regional Indian
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 11:03
#671860

Interesting observation. Keysianism failed in in his hey day. He was their, guiding hand.

Thanks Jim, I’ll put that in my conspiratorial axiom list.

Governments world over were forced to adopt the Keynsian model because it was a known failure and ended up enriching the oily-garks while impoverishing the common man/woman/child.

Ergo, all Keynsians are either

1) Foolish (unlikely)

2) Curropt (very likely)

3) Co-opted (obvious)

ORI

http://aadivaahan.wordpress.com

Login or register to post comments by Kina
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 11:13
#671868

Found a modeling of the coming stock market burst, done in slow motion.

 

Notice how the big boys (red) exit at light speed, leaving the lumbering others with zero support and ending up a wet mess on the table.

Good luck to those who think they can get out in time when this thing blows.

Login or register to post comments by treemagnet
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 16:58
#672364

So whose the retard who flagged this as junk?  Black Swan I especially like your last line.  It sums up the essence of my thoughts – 150 or so equities accounting for nearly half the volume in a historically low volume flow, controlled by drunken shepards and inbred sheeple.  When these HFT’s decide to stop playing, it’ll be gone baby gone.  I was on the phone with my broker (a terminal bull) during the flash crash.  There was a part of me that was absolutely fascinated with the incredulous angst in his voice….you nailed it, at some point 10 percent of the market will take their ball and go home in 10 minutes and thats just the first chapter in this sad, sordid tale.

Login or register to post comments by StychoKiller
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 23:38
#672879

If the Ignorati re-elect too many Decepticrats in Nov, I guarantee I’m closing my IRA and taking possession of what’s left!  (Not that the Republicons will do any better, but someone’s gotta cock-block Obamatron!)

Login or register to post comments by pamriallc
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 11:18
#671878

whats true is that “lock to lock” from 1929 to 1939 the economy grew.  the gut of the economy changed a lot.  even in Germany under Hitler, with allied forces bombing Germany into complete submission, we note the following:

the “GDP” of germany declined by 50% during this period and due to the complete gutting of their infrastructure and etc…

6 years after the war, German GDP was actualy ABOVE the levels seen just prior to WW2

whats the point in mentioning this?

simple:  no one died in the current crisis, no one slaughtered 6MM people and created mass graves.  you have instead a banking system that got too leveraged, consumers who were over-leveraged, and as this is worked off, the economy will recover.

people act like the current situation is the end of the world.  rather, we believe it is the beinning of something much better, something that we can be proud to be a part of.

the USA is not Germany under Hitler and the idea of “getting over ourselves” and getting back to work vs complaining about the present—-  that could actually improve things a lot more.

two weeks ago in Norway reviewing investments for clients, last week in San Francisco visiting companies for clients, now in Vancouver BC on the way to Shanghai and Beijing—  yes….   digging digging digging for more awesome opportunities for my Family Office.

making it better, one bankable opportunity after another.

shawn a. mesaros   pamria, llc (pacific asset management)

Login or register to post comments by ebworthen
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 11:23
#671885

The over-leveraging of corporations and governments brought about the global depression which brought about World War II.

This time, we have nukes.

Login or register to post comments by sgt_doom
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 13:00
#672056

Pithy and brilliantly articulated, ebworthen.

Login or register to post comments by Green Leader
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 18:32
#672467

…plus tectonic, weather & bioweapons.

Watch the show…courtesy of the US Military:

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/tatl/loop-wv.html

 

 

Login or register to post comments by Cathartes Aura
on Sun, 10/24/2010 – 00:47
#672962

. . .nice!

tie these in with the blue beam ops & you’ve got everyone’s attention. . .

Login or register to post comments by snowball777
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 11:24
#671886

So your suggestion is that we bomb ourselves into the stone age?

 

Login or register to post comments by ebworthen
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 12:00
#671939

Not a suggestion, just an observation that the stakes are higher this time around.

My only suggestion would be public hangings of the malfeasant.

Login or register to post comments by zaknick
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 12:38
#672013

Yaaay, hangings!!!!

 

Can we havz guillotines too?? Please?

pammya seems to be deep into that kool-aid

 

Anybody who knows just what the hell is happenning to this country, what has really happened to this country over the last century (uh oh, conspiracy theories), would oppose the fascist scum running the country and their “central bankster dollar”. Unless you’re deeply invested in the status quo. With income inequality rates like today, the vast majority are not benefitting from this “system” and instead would benefit from major changes in society. Making the economy and money work for people instead of the other way around would be a great start (it is possible with the banksters guillotined).

 

Abraham Lincoln:

1864

“We gave the people of this republic the greatest blessing they ever had, their own paper money to pay their own debts.”

1865

In a statement to Congress, “I have two great enemies, the Southern army in front of me and the financial institutions in the rear. Of the two, the one in my rear is my greater foe.”

Login or register to post comments by traderjoe
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 18:27
#672461

Zak – Agreed, agreed. Pammya is a ‘money-changer’. Someone that benefits from the ponzi-private banking cartel system that creates inflation to rob citizens of their stored value (thereby requiring them to ‘invest’ their money). 

As long as he is making people invest at 1% fees or more (charging them to use their money), he’s happy. He cares not about the 44 million on food stamps. The 25% homes underwater. The 17% U-6 unemployment. 

GDP is his measure of economic health and happiness, because the centralization of rewards brings him client monies, which bring him fees. That is his worldview.

For him, it would be beneficial if the Feds waved their wands to fix the mortgage mess. It would reduce ‘uncertainty’ – even though in the long-run it might reduce our citizenry’s freedom. 

 

Login or register to post comments by Fred Hayek
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 21:09
#672679

That’s a bit strong.  You’re assuming a knowledge of his thoughts and motivation of which you can’t be certain. 

Login or register to post comments by 11b40
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 18:18
#672046

Just in case you forgot, WW3 has already started, and it is against a phantom enemy that can never be defeated.  On top of that, these invisible “terrorists” will one day acquire the big bomb….or maybe not.  Maybe it will be bio-terror, electronic terror, or maybe just hitting a few malls around Christmas an causing economic terror.

Maybe all the jobs will come from the Department of Homeland Security.  I see they are monitoring collegefootball games now.  Modern day equivalent of WW2.  We could slap 1,000% tariff on anything that has to do with surveillance and create a huge new domestic industry, too.

Login or register to post comments by New_Meat
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 20:55
#672658

+1 ‘nother grunt heard from – Ned

Login or register to post comments by Fred Hayek
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 21:10
#672680

What are you talking about?!  We’ve always been at war with East Asia!

Login or register to post comments by ToNYC
on Sun, 10/24/2010 – 06:46
#673097

 

HSA/TSA are now the scourge of Individual Liberty. The default restriction of traffic and travel to avoid the hassles only isolates the US Citizen from the Global perception of what this absurdist terror/terrorist debacle fiasco fantasy has wrought on a Free People in the false name of Security. The aditional benefit is random confiscation as if the asbestos particle on your paper currency makes you the proximate cause and contributor to mesothelioma. Isolation slows the notice of the diminishing value of the USD. The cure is worse than the disease. Primum non nocere.

Login or register to post comments by unum mountaineer
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 11:36
#671907

people act like the current situation is the end of the world.  rather, we believe it is the beinning of something much better, something that we can be proud to be a part of.That sounds so familiar…where have I heard of someone trying really really hard to convince themselves…oh wait..there this..the real purpose of my job is to make capital markets more efficient and ultimately provide the U.S. consumer with more efficient ways to leverage and finance himself, so there is a humble, noble and ethical reason for my job 😉 amazing how good I am in convincing myself!!!’Fabrice Tourrehave a good one guy..don’t take any walks on short piers..

Login or register to post comments by Sean7k
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 11:56
#671930

Perhaps you should reread the piece. You have obviously missed the point. This is about using the same methods as last time. Declaring that they worked last time, when they did not. 

This is about the need to use other methods to restore health to the economy via Austrian methodology. 

The comparison to Hitler is a red herring. Germany improved later for two reasons: the US was the unchallenged economic leader in the world with the only fully functioning manufacturing base and two, we subsidized their reconstruction at the expense of US taxpayers.

While some people are continuing to maintain and expand business opportunities, a large percentage of Americans are not and there is no viable solution for their unemployment. Especially as long as we shelter banks and insurance companies by exchanging their liabilities for new capital at the expense of the taxpayer. Any business can profit if the playing field is tilted in their favor, much less turned on it’s head. 

The only solution to this madness is to allow the cycle to correct through what will now be massive deflation and dislocation. Then eliminate the central banking system and restore America to a sound money banking system that rewards investment, savings and production. 

 

Login or register to post comments by zaknick
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 14:05
#672037

deleted

Login or register to post comments by sgt_doom
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 13:01
#672060

Again, most scholarly…

Login or register to post comments by Sean7k
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 13:10
#672078

Thanks, but I’m sure I’ll say something to change your mind…

Login or register to post comments by traderjoe
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 18:30
#672463

I think BB give you a drive-by junk…

Well said…

Login or register to post comments by Diogenes
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 12:41
#672026

There were a couple of principles that guided German politics postwar and help account for their economic miracle.

1) They just had 12 years of Hitler and now they had a new government under the eye of the Allies. Socialism and dictatorship were out, capitalism and democracy were in.

2) They didn’t dare inflate the currency. The German people had seen their money wiped out and reduced to nothing 4 times in 40 years. The slightest sign of inflation would have caused an instant panic and bank run.

Democracy, capitalism, freedom, a sound currency and balanced budgets and in 10 years they recovered from the worst war in history and were better off financially than ever before.

Login or register to post comments by Fred Hayek
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 21:12
#672684

Weren’t the germans counseled by the U.S. and brits to go with a mixed economy but went much more free market under Adenauer?   I thought a history professor told me that.

Login or register to post comments by Jim Quinn
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 14:24
#672167

You are a linearist. There aren’t 6 million dead people, YET. I suggest you read The Fourth Turning. We are still in the early stages of this Crisis. The pain and suffering is yet to come. War is inevitable. Millions will die.

Login or register to post comments by Oh regional Indian
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 11:21
#671881

Keynes must be rolling in his deficient grave.

It is also clear the Keynsian monetary policy allowed the global war machine to grow to it’s current size.

Austrian school would have kept de-velopment more balanced.

ORI

http://aadivaahan.wordpress.com

 

Login or register to post comments by Temporalist
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 11:24
#671882

The government is always right, will always do the right thing for their people, take exact measurements and reports accurately in all instances.

The Great Depression started because there was not enough Prozac.

Krugman will always be right because even as more spending doesn’t work he will always be able to say it wasn’t enough.  He’s the type of guy at the gas pump that keeps pulling the handle even as the tank overlows because he hasn’t burst into flame “just yet.”

Login or register to post comments by ToNYC
on Sun, 10/24/2010 – 06:48
#673104

 

Remember that the more fake gas, the less the explosive nature of the diluted fuel.

Login or register to post comments by snowball777
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 11:22
#671883

The “Keynesian story” is that Hoover’s inaction with respect to bank failures and his idiotic tax bump in the face of falling revenues paved the way for true misery nationwide; he destroyed the capital structure of the US economy.

There’s something to be said for the electronic breadline masking the true scale of this recession, but it is also true that we would have BLS stats that match John Williams, if we’d done nothing.

That we should have gotten something for our tax dollars, like Glass-Steagall restored, clawbacks and bonus limits, a transaction tax, meaningful derivatives regulation, or even a completely nationalized bank or two (Citi and Bank of Lynching Countrywide, we’re looking at you) is obvious to many.

 

Login or register to post comments by pamriallc
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 11:47
#671920

currency debasement has been going on for centuries.  the roman empire went from gold to copper to tin before “the fall of rome” and it took several lifetimes for the full circle to complete itself.  “live by debasement—- live *IN* d-basement”— I always say.

 

shawn a. mesaros,   pamria, llc

Login or register to post comments by the grateful un…
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 11:26
#671890

a Depression is also a state of mind. During the 1st GD Roosevelt sent photographers out to document the suffering, in order to sell the country on New Deal. The 1st GD was propaganda at one level. There was also very little accountability. My grandparents got 10 cents on the dollar from their bank account. The banker told them the news personally. (I asked my mother, what, there was no meeting? How did you know you were being treated fairly? Evidently the towns merchants were given some leeway, as they did not go out of business. My grandfather lost his, and his mortgage, but got an FHA loan and kept their house)

Farmers could not sell their products because of price controls. Prices were kept high to make sure that farmers kept producing, but they ended up plowing crops back into the ground. 

There was a strong labor movement, communists and socialist organizations. WWII ended all that, partly because the government had complete control of the labor market during the war, they told you where you could work. They rationed goods, but of course there was a black market, and the rich kept wearing their top hats and tails. Just like today tehre was plenty of conspicuous consumption (Queen Elizabeth christens world msot luxurious cruise liner named for her- yesterday)

It entirely possible the Great Depression never ended, that the Fed reinflated the bubble several times, (or constantly by expanding the money supply) which implies the economic system is unworkable, period. The work ethic, people who work hard are more successful than lazy people, helped the financial oligarchs play labor off to see who would work for the least money. Then of course the corporate profit model was sustained by price fixing, (condoned by the government, see above) until such time as the Chinese entered the global market. The oligarchs got cheap labor, but the profit motive disappeared. Walmart is a profit-busting workers store, like the GUM store in Moscow years ago. Its sometimes hard to figure whose side we should be on.

Bernanke is a deflationist too, driving credit rates to zero, and destroying the former business of usury. In the 1930s there were no corporations. Think about that, no coke or pepsi, mcdonalds, no tv, no mass consumers. To that end we have all been living off the fat of these corporations, as they try to delever and downsize without losing profitability. Once the corporations start to go under, the full effect of the 1st (and only) Great Depression will continue.

While some emerging markets offer hope that the corporate model will find new customers, the ugly truth is their business model is too large, and too dependent on a constant supply of consumers, and commodities which are needed to process their products. And these emerging market consumers aren’t prepared to fully embrace the consumer lifestyle, and never will be, while Americans will move away from that lifestyle. The dysfunctional economic (Keynesian) model will finally be reversed, the Federal Reserve abolished, and then the Depression will (hopefully) end.

The half decade of corporate expansion was really veiled Keynesian policy, as governments expanded they needed a large supply of military and paramilitary hardware to maintain control and order.  As we can now see, government was in place to enable this expansion, sold under the false flag of nationalism, patriotism, and what have you, in fact the corporations were beholding to no flag or country, they were merely leading us toward a one world government. Obama has proved many of these theories, and is the perfect foil, and worth studying, to see how we have all been duped.

 

the truth is now much more clear than it ever has been.

 

Login or register to post comments by snowball777
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 11:32
#671899

An interesting perspective. You may want to consider that the properties you associate with the Fed are actually properties of capitalism itself.

And the 1930s had plenty of corporations, who do you think was in the NRA and futzing with prices?

Login or register to post comments by the grateful un…
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 11:39
#671911

good point on corporations, the supply of ubiquitous consumer products was still decades away. While we thought it was meant to improve our lifestyle it also empowered governments to outgrow their populations.

If your active policy is deflation (certainly in credit) then you aren’t a capitalist are you? 

under the heading there is no fool like an old fool, I note Warren Buffett  bought a railroad, when history suggests that conspicuous consumption is the economic sector he should have bought. and CC is a concept, along with disparity of wealth, which disproves the viability of the existing system.

Login or register to post comments by snowball777
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 12:04
#671946

Rational capitalism is never greeted well by either end of the spectrum…you’re as equally reviled as a Trot.

Warren’s choo-choo trains will be feeding Wal-Mart terminals in the midwest…I think he made a bet on both.

Login or register to post comments by the grateful un…
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 14:07
#672147

Walmart is hardly conspicious consumption. DId you see there were two IPO which were met with enthusiasm, which lifted the high end consumer discretionary market, yesterday. Then the Queen launched her ship. Like GD1, there is no real lack of spending, just further income inequality, and oddly enough, conspicious consumption among the poor, which were parodied in the old song, ‘Putting on the Ritz..’ The restaurant business is thriving, as it did in the 1st GD.

Login or register to post comments by snowball777
on Sun, 10/24/2010 – 00:04
#672907

The credit-money system allows for a great deal of wealth affectation, across the spectrum and provides the illusion of a frictionless world where most any demand becomes inflexible.

The problem with the ‘sticks and umb-er-ellas in their mitts’ crowd, is that they’ve got most everything they want and can live happily off their fixed-income investments while the Wal-Mart crowd pretty much needs to keep spending their entire income or more to stay off the street and fed.

Login or register to post comments by ToNYC
on Sun, 10/24/2010 – 07:01
#673109

 

You need Capitalism and to ride that Tiger to get complacent, brilliant monkeys a reason to overproduce. Let them be blinded by greed and serially get over it. In the processs, the Social Animals benefit from the animal spirits delvered by the rapacious Tiger…not becoming the Tiger.

Human rights before Corporate rights.

—shopping bag man in Tiananmen Square, June 5, 1989

Login or register to post comments by Oh regional Indian
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 11:54
#671927

Very well written grateful un.

Awesome recap. Very resonant too with the way I feel (and am just learning more and more).

Do you write somewhere?

ORI

 

Login or register to post comments by the grateful un…
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 14:45
#672206

am trying to put together a series of short stories with common, futurist theme. getting that sort of thing published is not easy. have you read ‘The Global Village’ by Powers and McLuhan?

Login or register to post comments by Oh regional Indian
on Sun, 10/24/2010 – 00:23
#672936

Good luck with the publishing road. I hear it can be rough.

And I have not read it but will definitely check out the Global Village.

ORI

Login or register to post comments by ToNYC
on Sun, 10/24/2010 – 07:03
#673112

 

take a look at

the business model is to make everyone be able to write a book.

Login or register to post comments by kaiserhoff
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 12:29
#671999

Let’s see now, coke was invented in 1884.  No corporations, except perhaps US Steel, Penn Central, Ford,…,no mass consumers, except perhaps for movies, which peaked in the 30s, baseball, radio…

I agree with much of what you say.  Your insights are quite valuable, but generalizations should be used with care. The world before the 50s was not quite primitive.

Login or register to post comments by 11b40
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 13:09
#672076

Not sure what I am missing in the below quote, but I was not aware that usury was a former business practice.  It seems to be alive and well in my part of the world.

“Bernanke is a deflationist too, driving credit rates to zero, and destroying the former business of usury.”

Login or register to post comments by 11b40
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 17:21
#672394

Not sure who junked me, but would like to know when usury stopped being a business practice?  With credit card rates as high as 30% and Pay Day L-enders thriving, it seems like usury is still a very profitable business.

Login or register to post comments by ToNYC
on Sun, 10/24/2010 – 07:06
#673116

 

ZIRP has so blinded the US citizen from noticing that the banks are working only their free fake FED money which they get for 0.25%. MEANWHILE the accumulated real savings by hard-working people gets put out to pasture with zero return. This is economic slavery.

Login or register to post comments by RobotTrader
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 11:36
#671905

Oh yeah, one other thing.

The “near zero interest rate policy” has kicked off yet another refi boom.

Hard to believe that another “refi bubble” may be starting, but here it is:

“Wilner Samson and Michelle Smedley, both doctors, just refinanced their home in West Hartford, Conn., saving $300 a month. “There were times during the housing boom when I felt I was missing out on a big party,” said Dr. Samson, a kidney specialist. “Now I’m getting my reward.”

Kathy and Mike Bernreuter have been working on the refinance of their home in Northbrook, Ill., since May.

This month the Bernreuters were told their new loan was on track for approval. Their mortgage payment should soon drop by more than $1,000 a month.

“Now we’ll have more money available to us to actually fix up this house,” said Mrs. Bernreuter.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/23/business/23refinance.html?_r=1&ref=todayspaper

Well, recessions don’t last forever.  We will emerge from this morass sooner or later.  Until the stock market tells us otherwise, it is already discounting a recovery.

QE2 or no QE2.

Republican victory or not.

If the bank stocks crack and the market breaks hard from here, then I’ll change my opinion because the market would have spoken.

Login or register to post comments by treemagnet
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 11:54
#671924

There will be no cracks in the dam – just a complete, sudden, catastrophic, cascading collapse.  I get what you’re saying and yeah, I wish I were long today so I could sell Monday.  If you’re long here, its an unrealized gain.  Puts and shorts will be in the green when the bulls are convinced the markets just taking a “breather”…then it’ll slip away again, and again.  But bulls won’t sell because they’ll want to get back to where they were.  Any of this sound familiar?  I will be greedy when you are afraid, but for now, you are winning – soak it up my friend.

Login or register to post comments by SteveNYC
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 13:38
#672106

I wonder if they were “sold” a floating rate/ARM, or whether our Dr. friends had the smarts to “fix”. To “fix”, or be “fixed”?

Login or register to post comments by ToNYC
on Sun, 10/24/2010 – 07:09
#673119

 

The Banks can always afford to send out one already rich winner every so often who getrs a taste of the 0.25% fake crash cash credit the FED gins up each day.

Login or register to post comments by deadhead
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 17:57
#672427

approx. 1/3 of americans have a sub 625 fico score.

 

credit is dead

Login or register to post comments by unum mountaineer
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 11:43
#671916

click click, there’s no place like home, click click there’s no place like , there’s no place like home…auntie Em, I had the strangest dream..

Login or register to post comments by Pants McPants
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 11:54
#671925

I strongly dislike Paul Krugman.

Login or register to post comments by Village Idiot
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 12:01
#671940

Dear ZH crew –

Welcome to the weekend. 

 

VI

Login or register to post comments by RobotTrader
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 12:05
#671949

 

Check out Ag’s Nightmare’s theme park…

Hilarious!!!

http://forums.wallstreetexaminer.com/blog/5/entry-241-turd-world-theme-park-to-open-monday/#comment456

Login or register to post comments by StychoKiller
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 23:57
#672903

Gravity isn’t just a good idea, it’s the Law! :>D

Login or register to post comments by Tao Jonesing
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 12:18
#671977

Milton Friedman was NOT a Keynesian, and it was his 1962 book “A Monetary History of the United States” that made the claim that the Federal Reserve caused the Great Depression by being too tight with monetary policy.

Bernanke, like Friedman, is NOT a Keynesian.  He’s another monetarist and a devoted follower of Milton Friedman.  Friedman’s version of supply side monetarism was intended as a rebuttal to Keynesianism.

To repeat, Chicago School monetarism is not now, nor was it ever, Keynesianism.  (And even Keynesianism had very little to do with Keynes.)

 

Login or register to post comments by sgt_doom
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 13:06
#672066

You have nailed it absolutely, Tao Jonesing!

This Hayek, von Mises, Milty Friedman crowd usually gets it all screwed up.

If only they had read Karl Polanyi, Henry George, and the economic democracy movement (ied.info).

Once more, ignorance shouts the loudest……

Login or register to post comments by Jim Quinn
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 14:33
#672184

Rothbard wrote “America’s Great Depression” in 1963. In their view, the Great Depression was the inevitable outcome of the easy credit policies of the Federal Reserve during the 1920s. Rothbard criticized Milton Friedman’s assertion that the central bank failed to inflate the supply of money. Rothbard asserts that the Federal Reserve purchased $1.1 billion of government securities from February to July 1932, which raised its total holding to $1.8 billion. Total bank reserves only rose by $212 million, but Rothbard argues that this was because the American populace lost faith in the banking system and began hoarding more cash, a factor very much beyond the control of the Central Bank. The potential for a run on the banks caused local bankers to be more conservative in lending out their reserves, and, Rothbard argues, was the cause of the Federal Reserve’s inability to inflate.

Friedman was about 35 years too late. Von Mises warned of a credit fueled collapse during the 1920′s.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704471504574443600711779692.html

Login or register to post comments by Fred Hayek
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 21:20
#672694

Well, technically, no one’s a Keynesian, including Krugman as not one of those identified with the theory have actually advocated running balanced budgets or surpluses in normal times so that a deficit can be run in bad times.  They all ignore  the first part and focus on the second part.

Login or register to post comments by alagon
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 12:41
#672024

Keynes believed that one should save money during good times, and spend money during bad times….The US never saved money!

Login or register to post comments by Fred Hayek
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 21:21
#672698

Oh, jeez.  I started typing away in response to the post above yours and didn’t see that you’d made the same point.

Login or register to post comments by count_zero
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 12:48
#672039

I’d just like to point out that most posts on ZH are assuming no future inventions or increases of productivity. That’s irrational pessimism.

Of course, if gov spending (the real driver of fed money printing, imho) isn’t wound-down the innovations won’t be enough to overcome the malinvestment in non-returning assets.

 

Login or register to post comments by sgt_doom
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 13:08
#672074

“I’d just like to point out that most posts on ZH are assuming no future inventions or increases of productivity.”

Negative!  Rational honesty is noting that those past increases in productivity have gone hand-in-hand with decreases in wages, and those inventions are immediately offshored for foreign manufacture, production and usage.

They have offshored innovation, my good man, and anyone who doesn’t comprehend that is sorely limited in cognition.

Login or register to post comments by traderjoe
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 18:40
#672481

IMHO, the increasing corporate attention to quarterly earnings has focused innovation on reducing expenses: automation, financial engineering, off-shoring, big-box retailing, online retailing, etc. which has brought about your reduction in wages. In addition, much of the product-based innovation has been in consumer goods, especially electronics, which does not necessarily increase productivity or societal wealth. A migration from a 17″ TV to a 19″ TV doesn’t really provide any societal value. 

Not to say a jet travel, personal computer type innovation isn’t out there, but those are few and far between and not really the focus of current corporate leaders… 

Login or register to post comments by Teaser
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 19:56
#672584

You’re right, it is irrational pessimism.

But consider this:

Speakers now produce sound as well as the human ear can possibly hear it (bose)

Computers now have more speed and power than 99% of human beings could possibly use.

TV sets now produce pictures that are as clear as the human eye can possibly see. (High Def)

Smart phones and Tablets are simply extensions of existing tech, not breakthroughs.

 

So, technology like mass production was great for getting mass produced gadgets into people’s hands.  computers, tvs, stereos, have reached the limit of human perception, along with many many other products.  Let me ask you, where IS the next big thing?  I don’t see it yet.

And let me end with an anecdote.  In college, I worked on commission in Sear’s white goods appliance section.  Made really really good money for a college student btw.  Anyway, during one summer a memo was sent out.  The memo announced that henceforth, engineers would be designing refrigerators to last only 8 years, rather than the 10 years they were making them last at the time.  The memo went on to say that this would increase refrigerator sales by x amount in the next decade.  I nearly fell over in the meeting, being an austrian econ major and all.  I mean HOLY SHIT, ENGINEERS ARE BEING TRAINED IN COLLEGE TO MAKE SHIT LAST ONLY JUST SO LONG!  This was 15 years ago, or thereabouts.

So, I submit to you, that the entirety of our economy is driven by cosumerism, or rather, the need to replace the gadgets you have faster and faster in order to keep the gears of capitalism as we know it now, running.

Perhaps we never really did leave the great depression?!

Login or register to post comments by Bear
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 21:01
#672665

Irrational pessimism indeed. Trends in global education, our national demographics, energy peaks, and the massive off-shoring of the last generation portend a pessimism that is certainly rational. 

Login or register to post comments by tmosley
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 22:03
#672756

Good luck making your “technical innovations” comply with existing and new regulations.  Good luck finding investors to help you bring your “technical innovations” to market in this environment.

My company has a fucking cure for HIV that WORKS sitting in a freezer, waiting for funding to take it through the legion of regulatory hurdles for getting it to market.  Due to the enormous hurdles that have been placed in our way both by regulators and granting agencies (our technology was “too new” and “untested” for us to receive funds to test it–what a crock), we have had to refocus away from drug development to materials, where we have had much more success.  We are continuing development of drugs on the side, but with only one scientist working on it in his spare time.

Happily, we also developed a cure for prostate cancer using the same new approach, and that research has been funded.  Hopefully we can get some traction on other drugs after we show our results on the anti-cancer project.

I’m not really sure what new technology is going to come about that is going to revolutionize the labor market.  Anything that would have a radical effect is just as likely to be stopped dead in its tracks as was our anti-HIV drug.

Login or register to post comments by Real Estate Geek
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 23:39
#672878

If your company has a cure for HIV, why are you still located in a place that has such enormous hurdles?

Why not relocate to a less-regulated country and let the world beat a path to your door?  Plenty of rich folks would travel abroad to get such a cure.

 

Login or register to post comments by StychoKiller
on Sun, 10/24/2010 – 00:02
#672906

I would gladly buy into a Corp. that develops a method for Shrinking Govt programs or making Stupidity more painful!

Login or register to post comments by sagelike
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 13:06
#672068

Even today economists don’t agree on what cured the depression but apparently Quinn believe’s he’s in possession of the unvarnished truth. Amazing!

I never trust people who make grand statements like this: “This storyline is a big lie.”

How do we know his thesis is not a Big Lie? We don’t.

Login or register to post comments by sgt_doom
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 13:10
#672077

Wisely stated, sagelike!

Those who only pay attention to, and espouse, monetary policy ignore the importance of securitized debt and the role it played in both the Great Depression and today.

They always ignore the debt factor, the securitized debt factor, and the ensuing ultra-leveraged speculation allowed by such nefarious processes.

It is their nature, after all….

Login or register to post comments by Jim Quinn
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 14:37
#672193

It’s my opinion, backed up with facts. Do your own research and come to your own conclusion. It’s called thinking.

Login or register to post comments by sagelike
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 15:14
#672242

Jeez Jim, your rebuttal missed my point completely and like so many, you resort to an insult buttress your position.

My point was not whether you are factually correct. I thought your article was good but plenty of very smart economists bring a load of `facts` to support their arguments and yet draw completely different conclusions than you did.

My point is that there`s no more certainty that you are correct vs. someone else and to present your theory as absolute truth and other theories as a `big lie` is just plain arrogant.

You have a well presented theory and nothing more.

Login or register to post comments by Jim Quinn
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 15:42
#672275

So you’ve called me untrustworthy and arrogant, but you think I insulted you by suggesting you think?

Everything anyone writes is an opinion. Sometimes you have to come down on a side. I don’t trust people who can’t decide what they believe.

Login or register to post comments by sagelike
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 18:41
#672457

I did not in any way call you untrustworthy and I said it’s arrogant to suggest any other opinion is a lie.

Talk about twisting my words man.

Login or register to post comments by Eureka Springs
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 13:42
#672112

the more these austrian friedmanites bash keynes, the more i like him.

the shock doctors never sleep. I think it’s the free market meth and too many episodesof gunsmoke.

Login or register to post comments by bugs_
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 13:47
#672122

Hey wait a minute!  The inflationists have an altar???  This sucks, the folding tray table that was in the deflationists lounge is gone.

Login or register to post comments by OutLookingIn
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 13:56
#672136

 

 Jim – Don’t know where you came up with the Ludwig Von Mises quote.

Here is the version that is most common;

“There is no means of avoiding the final collapse of a boom brought about by credit expansion. The alternative is only whether the crises should come sooner as the result of a voluntary abandonment of further credit expansion, or later as a final and total catastrophe of the currency system involved.”

-Ludwig Von Mises

Login or register to post comments by tom
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 16:59
#672355

I agree that Obama and others are stupidly using half-baked understandings of what happened in the 1930s to justify stimulus and, more importantly, refusal to make a post-bubble fiscal adjustment.

But Quinn’s analysis of what happened in the 1930s isn’t much better. There were multiple causes of the depression, but besides the 1920s stock bubble, the most important was the pegging of the dollar to gold. As real output declined, the dollar became overvalued, people pulled dollars out of banks to exchange them for gold, demonetizing and thus shrinking the economy, and the process snowballed.

As for the 1937-8 recession, sure the government’s anti-trust battle did have something to do with it, but that was well worth it. How so-called “libertarians” imagine that allowing corporations total free rein to extract monopoly rents and shit in everybody’s water and air aids the cause of liberty, I’ll never understand.

Login or register to post comments by StychoKiller
on Sun, 10/24/2010 – 00:07
#672911

I agree that Obama and others are stupidly using half-baked understandings of what happened in the 1930s to justify stimulus and, more importantly, refusal to make a post-bubble fiscal adjustment.

As any politician will tell you, sitting on your hands and doing nothing just doesn’t sit well with people after their own particular ox has been gored!

Login or register to post comments by Mr.Kowalski
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 17:13
#672383

It’s not a Depression for everybody: “To ensure fool-proof security, the President Obama’s team has booked the entire the Taj Mahal Hotel, including 570 rooms, all banquets and restaurants. Since his security contingent and staff will comprise a huge number, 125 rooms at Taj President have also been booked, apart from 80 to 90 rooms each in Grand Hyatt and The Oberoi hotels. The NCPA, where the President is expected to meet representatives from the business community, has also been entirely booked. 

The officer said, “Obama’s contingent is huge. There are two jumbo jets coming along with Air Force One, which will be flanked by security jets. There will be 30 to 40 secret service agents, who will arrive before him. The President’s convoy has 45 cars, including the Lincoln Continental in which the President travels.” 

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/Barack-and-Michelles-Mumbai-darshan-plans/articleshow/6797379.cms

Login or register to post comments by the grateful un…
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 21:14
#672686

i am loathe to suggest that what you are saying is that the President is appearing to represent those on the bottom side of the income equality divide, while living on the upper side of that line, so therefore i am loathe. (and fearful)

Login or register to post comments by Hunch Trader
on Sun, 10/24/2010 – 04:25
#673038

Obama, the Sultan of the United States.

 

Login or register to post comments by BurningFuld
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 17:25
#672396

OR

Da rich people lend money to da poor people thereby making da rich people continually richer and da poor people continually poorer, until it quits working.

Login or register to post comments by philgramm
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 17:34
#672411

Anarchy—Let’s shake the dirt off this great word and reclaim it from the statists

Login or register to post comments by MRalwaysRIGHT
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 18:14
#672442

A great article, but it misses the killer-punch of currency & debt default – for the full picture see http://www.cmrworld.com/MCDBlog.asp 

Login or register to post comments by Bear
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 20:43
#672642

I understand default … but I don’t understand you methodology. One day old dollar is gone, new dollar is on with no conversion. All money markets gone, all cash gone, all savings of Americans gone, all debt gone, all mortgages gone. Default, yes … but all you have to do is drive $ to 0 to make this happen and we are frogs in boiling water instead of making an army for 20,000,000 holders of dollars and guns.

 

Login or register to post comments by Mr.Kowalski
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 19:16
#672539

I honestly believe that these people (Ben, Obama, etc) fully believe that a recovery is right around the corner. They believe that blogs such as ZH are where the crazies hang out. But I dare anyone in Wash DC to match my own predictions made for this year.. and I’m one of the simple serfs: http://themeanoldinvestor.blogspot.com/2009/12/outlook-for-2010.html

Login or register to post comments by doomandbloom
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 19:17
#672542

this is like the movie ‘inception’….dream within a dream…

Login or register to post comments by THE DORK OF CORK
on Sun, 10/24/2010 – 04:37
#672697

The real money is essentially a monetarist bailout of the banks – the Keynesian bit is a little add on to keep the patient alive while the banks balance sheets attempt to repair themselves.

The focus on John and not Milton is dubious in the extreme as both their solutions depended on  debt issuance.

I believe it is marginally better to have Keynesian placebo as at least the populace have more awareness of the true debt in the system rather then the magic tricks that bankers play with.

Besides a Keynesian / indirect banking control ecosystem seems a more effective governance then a direct banking but subversive off fiscal books debt money supply manipulation that the Friedmanites love so much.

Keynes has produced massive capital creation during its early years – the friedmanites have produced nothing but junk and Jehovah’s.

Login or register to post comments by non-anon
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 22:19
#672773

I know more than boobus b/c of Zero Hedge.

Thus I will be turning on, tuning in and dropping out!

Login or register to post comments by mcarthur
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 22:54
#672822

Hoover always got a bad rap.  Todays demand drought/deleveraging will prove this out in time.  Bernake is pushing on a rope.  Burning every Walmart, a Chinese state enterprise, to the ground would do more to solve issues than printing money.

Login or register to post comments by Azwethinkweiz
on Sat, 10/23/2010 – 23:27
#672864

The Barkley Hotel just opened! It’s better than the Four Seasons…except, well, it’s only for dogs. A multimillion dollar hotel just opened (FOR PETS) which feature, well, you guys can look for yourselves. (not shown on the site is that each dog has his/her own flatscreen television in their room.) WHAT RECESSION/DEPRESSION?

 

http://westlake.thebarkleypethotel.com/accommodations/canine_quarters.aspx

Login or register to post comments by Dan The Man
on Sun, 10/24/2010 – 00:48
#672964

Just like Brock Lesnar…When you reach the top, the only way to go is down.

Login or register to post comments by Wave-Tech
on Sun, 10/24/2010 – 02:22
#673000

Why are things the way they are?  

It’s the money STUPID…

http://elliottwavetechnology.blogspot.com/2010/10/its-money-stupid.html

 

Wall Street seems to have hit bottom nearly a year ago.  On the back of an 11th hour bailout by Main Street, Wall Street is enjoying a rather bountiful and robust V-shaped recovery.

Meanwhile, Main Street struggles with frustration, anger, and envy.  How could this be justified?  After all, Main Street bailed out Wall Street.  Without Main Street, Wall Street would have collapsed, right?

Why is this?

 

 

Login or register to post comments by SendMeYourWorth…
on Sun, 10/24/2010 – 03:47
#673031

Quinn’s writing has bits of truth.  The chart below shows the shift of money to the wealthy, with another peak just 3 years after FDR took office, assisted by regressive taxes on commodities like gasoline and food, tax-loopholes for the wealthiest. That peak had begun to grow again when FDR reduced the WPA and PWA efforts. Eventually the war hiring kicked in and for the next 30 years the U.S. enjoyed a prosperity that was the envy of the world.

Quinn is quite correct about the porky stimulus, and much of the spending done today enriches countries outside of our borders.

But just because the economics of really investing in our country and people has not been tried does not mean it won’t work. A $4-6 trillion jobs program which puts us to work building the infrasturcture and developing the energy sources we will use in the 22nd century would give us the revenue to rebuild our manufacturing and begin to create the wealth that would save this country. Other nations know this and they are funding their own programs with far greater urgency, and money, than we seem to have the political will to accomplish.

If we don’t we will lose the control of our lives and country to those who had the vision to invest in their people and their country.

Look at the income gap prior to the Great Depression in the chart below. Look at it today. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/29/business/29tax.html?_r=1

Login or register to post comments by THE DORK OF CORK
on Sun, 10/24/2010 – 04:52
#673045

The depression continued because FDR did not devalue the dollar enough.

 

Therefore industry continued to pay for excess 1920s credit creation of the banks by paying interest on a overvalued dollar.

 

Login or register to post comments by THE DORK OF CORK
on Sun, 10/24/2010 – 04:57
#673046

 

 

Login or register to post comments by THE DORK OF CORK
on Sun, 10/24/2010 – 04:56
#673047

 

 

Login or register to post comments by THE DORK OF CORK
on Sun, 10/24/2010 – 04:55
#673048

 

 

Login or register to post comments by THE DORK OF CORK
on Sun, 10/24/2010 – 04:54
#673049

 

 

Login or register to post comments by THE DORK OF CORK
on Sun, 10/24/2010 – 04:53
#673050

 

 

Login or register to post comments by TheMonetaryRed
on Sun, 10/24/2010 – 05:17
#673060

I’m curious: does anybody on this blog know how much of the 2009 stimulus was tax cuts?

Login or register to post comments by Young
on Sun, 10/24/2010 – 05:25
#673064

I’m tired of this discussion. I’m in the austerity camp – someone always has to pay. The FED will pay the price of their own demise sooner or later. Indebted consumers will pay for their lack of personal financial control, and, reasonable non levered humans and small/medium business owners will pay for others stupidity. In the latter group, some of their profits was fictitious/built on low interest rates. SOMEONE ALWAYS HAS TO PAY. Of course in Unicorn Keynesian land, where unlimited growth is possible, no one has to pay. Now what’s wrong with that picture?

Login or register to post comments by THE DORK OF CORK
on Sun, 10/24/2010 – 05:45
#673077

Austrians conveniently ignore the true nature of compound interest when it suits them – if we look at a more modern credit explosion followed by a crash lets look at Volcker’s role in crashing the economy and who benefited – l am disturbed by some Austrians fawning over Volcker’s high interest rates when it destroyed the American economy.

You cannot be a hybrid Austrian by hording debt money and its interest.

Volcker essentially started a process of massive capital rundown of the US where the surplus created was expressed in interest that was spent on consumption – capital was exported and America was hollowed out.

I can see this same process in the European periphery now – the ECB aim to do a Volcker on  Euro  Gold and keep it strong  for 10 or more years by destroying capital and industry to sustain the ponzi.

 

Login or register to post comments by Young
on Sun, 10/24/2010 – 07:08
#673117

Growth/profits/jobs built on easy credit aren’t sustainable in the long run, and aren’t supposed to be there in the first place if we speak about a sound economic system. Subprime borrowers, really weren’t supposed to own a home in the first place, still the media fails to get to the root of the problem – the political utopian view that everyone has a right to own their home – and blame someone else. The two decade equity pump up is an illusion based on low interest rates… And the list goes on.

But I do agree with you on the basic premise that it is wrong to use austerity to try to clean out the system and then return to the “ponzi” as you call it. So, what we really have in both camps is Einsteins definition of madness: Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

But it’s typical political sweep under the rug stupidity, they never go to the root of the problem.

Login or register to post comments Comment viewing options Flat list – collapsedFlat list – expandedThreaded list – collapsedThreaded list – expanded Date – newest firstDate – oldest first 10 comments per page30 comments per page50 comments per page70 comments per page90 comments per page150 comments per page200 comments per page250 comments per page300 comments per pageSelect your preferred way to display the comments and click “Save settings” to activate your changes. Search Search this site: Latest News From RAN Squawk 10-22 15:31: RANSQUAWK AUDIO CLOSED FOR THE WEEKEND; THE DESK WILL REOPEN MONDAY 0630 (LONDON TIME). 10-22 15:27: Coca-Cola Enterprises (CCE) increases quaterly dividend to USD 0.12 10-22 15:06: RANsquawk ‘Market Wrap Up’: Video uploaded to http://www.youtube.com 10-22 15:03: US EQUITY WRAP 10-22 14:20: Support seen in GBP/USD at 1.5644, trades 1.5667 last 10-22 14:19: S&P US distress ratio at lowest point in 5 months 10-22 14:18: Conocophillips (COP) reports flaring at Rodeo, California, refinery – filing 10-22 14:02: US FIXED INCOME WRAP Latest News From The Fly On The Wall 10-22 16:47: Hyatt Hotels and Starwood Capital announce joint venture 10-22 16:26: Ameris acquires First Bank of Jacksonville 10-22 16:18: Ardea Biosciences files $100M mixed securities shelf 10-22 16:04: Shaw acquisition of Canwest Broadcasting expected to close 27 October 10-22 16:01: DJSP Enterprises reduces staffing by an additional 198 employees 10-22 15:52: Molecular Insight announces extension of waiver agreement with bond holders 10-22 15:48: Value Line announces special dividend of $2 per share 10-22 15:44: Gold Resource registers to sell 3.47M shares of common stock for holders The Zero Hedge Team

Tyler Durden – Founder

Marla Singer – Foil

Travis – Author

Cornelius – Author

Sacrilege – Senior Researcher

 

tips [ at ] zerohedge [ dot ] com – Our Reader Tips Mailbox

Make sure to read our “How To [Read/Tip Off] Zero Hedge Without Attracting The Interest Of [Human Resources/The Treasury/Black Helicopters]” Guide

ads [ at ] zerohedge [ dot ] com – Advertising Inquiries.

abuse [ at ] zerohedge [ dot ] com – Abuse / Infringement Issues

 

It would be very wise of you to study our disclaimer, our privacy policy and our (non)policy on conflicts / full disclosure.

 

Zero Hedge Offices:

United States:
888.qui.zero (888.784.9376)

Zurich:
+41 43 501 6717

London:
+44 20 3318 4753

copyright ©2009, 2010 zero hedge – limited reproduction (with attribution) permitted by request

zero hedge’s redundancy powered by:

Powered by Ubercart, the free shopping cart software.

View the Original article

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Guest Post: Depression Within A Depression

  1. Subject: Request For Guest Posting.

    Hi Mate,

    I am Alex,owner of some quality financial domains on Mortgage, Real estate, Loan, Debt & other various finance topics. Today, while searching for a suitable blog, I just come across yours. I have gone through it and found it very resourceful. I must appreciate your hard work and wish you good luck.

    I want to submit brand new guest posts in your site: newyorkfinance.wordpress.com, only if you permit me.
    My article will be on topic of your site. In return, your guest post will be published in my website. Not only that I will give you the total rights to edit the article and modify it as per your needs.

    let me know your thoughts. Waiting for your positive reply.
    If you have any questions or need anything feel free to contact me at : brown.alex916@gmail.com

    Best Regards,
    Alex Brown
    Webmaster
    Chicago, Illinois – 60607, US
    Skype ID: alex.brown239
    Follow me on : Facebook & Twiiter

  2. hey there and thank you for your info ? I’ve certainly picked up anything new from proper here. I did then again expertise a few technical issues using this website, since I skilled to reload the site a lot of occasions previous to I may get it to load correctly. I have been brooding about in case your web host is OK? Now not that I’m complaining, but slow loading cases times will sometimes have an effect on your placement in google and could harm your quality score if ads and marketing with Adwords. Anyway I am adding this RSS to my e-mail and can glance out for much more of your respective fascinating content. Ensure that you replace this again soon..

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s