Reluctant Breadwinners, Downsized Housing; Demographic Pendulum in Motion

Because of losses in construction and manufacturing, unemployment has taken its toll on more men than women. Please consider More Wives Head for Work Angela Patterson is working as an insurance agent in New York while her husband looks for construction jobs in North Carolina. Diana Gomez had been staying home to care for an ill daughter. When her husband lost his job, she became an administrative assistant in a dentist’s office. Michelle, a social worker and mother of three young children in Baltimore, who asked that her last name not be used, switched from part-time to full-time work when her husband was laid off last year. She kept to that schedule after he found work earlier this year—at two-thirds his former salary.

They are the reluctant breadwinners: Women who wanted to stay home until their income suddenly became critical to the well-being of their families. In some cases they are increasing their hours to keep the bills paid. Others are taking up employment for the first time as their husbands struggle to find work. With the anemic recovery keeping the job outlook uncertain, the accelerated gender shift is likely to stick, creating new challenges for U.S. families.

In a study published this September in the journal Family Relations, researchers Marybeth J. Mattingly and Kristin E. Smith of the University of New Hampshire found that wives were more likely to enter the job market or increase their hours when their husbands were out of work between May 2007 and May 2008 than when their husbands were out of work amid prosperity four years earlier. These women were also three times more likely to enter the labor force than women whose husbands were working and 51 percent more likely to increase their hours. Smith says difficult times may push women to take jobs they wouldn’t consider when the economy is strong. “They have to work,” she says. “As families lose their primary breadwinner, they’re making ends meet with a lower-earning spouse.”

By now, the impact of the recession on the American male is well chronicled: Men accounted for more than 71 percent of the job losses as sectors like manufacturing and construction were crushed. Even when job losses spread to traditionally female-friendly areas like retail and education, women continued to fare better. The latest unemployment figures stand at 9.8 percent for men 20 or over and 8 percent for their female counterparts, with women making up 47 percent of the total labor force.

The recession has accelerated a trend that first became apparent years ago—wives entering the workforce to boost family earnings. The difference now is that what might have been viewed as optional income has become critical. As Manpower (MAN) Chief Executive Officer Jeffrey A. Joerres points out, “the reality is that Joe is not finding a job anytime soon.” Daily Femme Chimes In

Ashleigh, writing for The Daily Femme takes issue with the story in her commentary Are we “reluctant breadwinners”?
Am I the only one who feels like this is a decidedly outdated sentiment? Sure, there are plenty of women who would prefer to stay home and care for their families, and far be it from me to judge them. But the assertion that women going back to work will create “new challenges” seems a little stale. Women have been working outside the home for some time now, and any challenge (real or imagined) that this creates is certainly not new.

The Bloomberg article has a very “’50s” feel to it, alluding that many women are essentially being forced to work outside the home because they have no choice and that this spells disaster for American families. But it at least outlines one of the biggest issues of gender inequality in today’s workforce: men continue to be paid more. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reports women’s median weekly earnings were 83 percent of men’s in the second quarter of 2010. This gap persists despite the fact that women earn 60 percent of all bachelor’s and master’s degrees. The gap also reflects the fact that many of the sectors that attract women generally pay less than the sectors traditionally dominated by men.

This article has some legitimate information, but really the only question I had after reading it was, “why is this news?”. Why should it be deemed breaking information that women are working to support their families?Changing Social Trends The Real Story

While admittedly the BusinessWeek story does have that “50’s feel”, Ashleigh misses the point. The point is families are being disrupted by changing social trends, whether the story has a “50’s feel” or not.

Here are some more examples of pertinent changing social trends.

Student Debt

Tens of thousands of students graduate from college each year without a job, deep in debt, and many of them are doubling up households or moving back home. This disrupts family formation with impacts on housing and demand for goods and services.

Boomers did not graduate from college deep in debt. Tuition was $250 a semester when I started at the University of Illinois, and about $400 a semester the final semester.

Walmart Greeters

Take a look at the average age and sex of the greeters at Walmart. Are those people, mostly women, in those jobs because they want to, or because they have to?

Jobs are so few that grandparents compete against their kids and grandkids for those jobs!

If you were an employer, who would you hire to fill those positions: someone in their 30’s or 40’s raising a family in need of expensive health care coverage, or someone past retirement age on Medicare?

That women dominate such jobs offers one of the reasons women make less. Another reason is some women have disrupted their careers to raise families.

How many women engineers are there compared to men? Geologists? Physicians? Social Workers? Construction workers? Comparing degrees is not a valid way of determining whether or not women are underpaid relative to men.

Deflationary Impact of Trends

As boomers head towards retirement, and students deep in debt cannot find jobs that will allow them to quickly pay down that debt, all kinds of unfavorable demographic trends are playing out.

Importantly, the downsizing of boomer lifestyles will put pressure on high end housing for a long time.

Trends in Housing

I was in North Carolina these past two week, staying in a beach house owned by a person on my blog who posts under the name “Black Swan”. Thanks Swan!

Swan developed and sold many properties on Topsail Island. I met another developer on the Island, and both of them are downsizing the sizes of the units they are building and intending to build. While not “breaking news”, it certainly is another piece of the puzzle.

Smaller homes means less lumber, less granite, less drywall, less bathrooms, less furniture, less everything.

Needs of Downsizing Boomers

Aging boomers will be dependent on their children to look after them, yet the children do not really want their parents moving back in.

Taking those factors into consideration, “Black Swan” has plans to put two smaller homes on one parcel, say a 1200-1500 square foot home as well as separate 500 square foot home on the same lot.

Demographic Pendulum in Motion

Few understand the deflationary impacts of the entire gamut of trends that is playing out, or the stress these trends place on families.

It is futile to fight changing social trends, but that has not stopped the Fed with reckless proposals on top of reckless proposals. Please see Inflation Targeting Proposal an Exercise in Blazing Stupidity; Fed Fools Itself for more details.

As I stated in June of 2008, we are now on the back side of peak consumption and Peak Credit. Regardless of what Bernanke of the Fed does, the demographic pendulum is in motion. There is no going back.

Mike “Mish” Shedlock
Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List

Bookmark and Share
Posted by Michael Shedlock at 12:32 PM…. Print…. Email

To sign up for a free copy of our Monthly Client Newsletter, please register your email address at the bottom of the Sitka Pacific Commentary Page.

Buy Gold and Silver Online at GoldMoney
The Best Way to Buy Gold and Silver

Disclaimer:The content on this site is provided as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. All site content, including advertisements, shall not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or financial instrument, or to participate in any particular trading or investment strategy. The ideas expressed on this site are solely the opinions of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the opinions of sponsors or firms affiliated with the author(s). The author may or may not have a position in any company or advertiser referenced above. Any action that you take as a result of information, analysis, or advertisement on this site is ultimately your responsibility. Consult your investment adviser before making any investment decisions.

Comment Guidelines: Comments should be succinct, constructive and relevant to the story. We encourage engaging, diverse and meaningful commentary. Comments that include personal attacks, racial, religious, or ethnic slurs are not permitted. We continuously review and remove any inappropriate comments.


Newer PostOlder PostHomeSubscribe to:.About Mike Shedlock Mike Shedlock / Mish is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. Continue reading…    
 Mish Audio VideoMish with Marc Faber 2010-03-12
“Inflation or Deflation?” Debate: Mish vs. Dr. Doom

On the Edge with Max Keiser 2010-02-12
Spotlight on China, Japan, Jobs, Pensions, Part 1

Spotlight on China, Japan, Jobs, Pensions, Part 2

Tech Ticker 2009-12-09
“Bank Lending, Jobs, The Great Retrace

King World News October 30 2009
Mish and Eric King discuss Gold, the Stock Market, the US Dollar, Sideline Cash, China, and US real estate

May 2009: My Speech at Google – on Blogging and the Economy
Thoughts on Blogging and the Economy – Speech at Google

Podcasts Every ThursdayHoweStreet

May 18, 2009Jay Taylor and Mish discuss deflation and other issues on Voice America

April 27, 2009
The Lew Rockwell Show – “It’s Fallen and It Can’t Get Up”

April 26, 2009
TDI Podcast 106: ZeroHedge and Mish-O-Nomics

January 25, 2009TDI Podcast 92: An Unavoidable Depression? (Dent and Shedlock)

January 7, 2009Commodity Watch Radio – 2009 : Mish and Mike Hampton Give Their Views

November 12, 2008
The Lew Rockwell Show

October 23, 2008
TDI Episode 80: Predicting another 40% DOWN

October 17, 2008
Commodity Watch Radio – A look at the markets Michael Hampton, Mish

August 24,2008
Commodity Watch Radio – Inflation or Deflation? Part 1 James Turk, Michael Hampton, Mish

 John Dennis Beat Pelosi Mish Endorsement of John Dennis  Lawson for Congress Mish Endorsement of B.J. Lawson  Doug Cloud For Congress Mish Endorsement of Doug Cloud  
Calculated RiskLoading…naked capitalismLoading…Steve Keen’s DebtwatchLoading…oftwomindsLoading…Acting Man Austrian Economics DiscussionLoading…Copyright 2009 Mike Shedlock. All Rights Reserved.View My StatsHomeAboutContactSitka Pacific.js-kit-comments { background-color: #ffffff; } white-space: nowrap; color: #ff0000; margin: 0px 0px 0px 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 0px; }.js-singleComment { font-size: 9pt; color: #000000; line-height: 1.0em; margin: 0px 0px 0px 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 0px; font-family: Verdana, Helvetica; border: solid 1px #c0c0c0; text-align: left; }

View the Original article


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s